Elections are not won on the Street: The Country By: Editorial Wednesday July 19, 2006 expect weeks of turmoil, "" In countries with solvent institutions of arbitration, elections are not won on the street, "the daily adviertió. It adds that "the defeated populist candidate (López Obrador) has every right to dispute the results of an election so tight. But this work belongs to a special tribunal of seven judges with broad powers and no party or governmental agencies known. Pretender to transfer the claim to the street, keeping in turmoil for hundreds of thousands of people, is an irresponsible policy. El Pais emphasizes that "the protests and demonstrations carried out so far by supporters of Obrador, the last mass on Sunday in the federal capital-could go wrong at any time. The artificial extreme antagonism between the two leaders, which begins to take over the streets, leads only to confrontation. "" Mexico needs above all a leader with a strong mandate to boost its nascent democratic transition and the essential and very serious political reforms economic and outstanding. That the final decision on who should adopt it as an electoral tribunal is not ideal, but only reflects the unusually tight results on July 2. Results, however, that representatives of Lopez Obrador signed in many polling stations now impugns count of which the former mayor of Mexico City. "The Wall Street Journal published for this past election was" the most fair and transparent elections in the history of Latin America "The French daily Le Figaro warned that nothing would be worse for Mexico to open the road to questioning the institutions, and recognized the maturity shown by the Mexican elections on 2 July. http://www.cronica.com.mx/nota.php?id_nota=251928
this if it is a comple ... Informational Peje Lopez Obrador = = = AMLO MALO. If you inform, whether to pursue enforcement of the Act is to make a plot, this one is. 
0 comments:
Post a Comment