They doubt that the Court invalidated the election Lawyers agree that the Electoral Tribunal of the Judiciary of the Federation (TEPJF) has the power to override the presidential election, but consider that currently there are no elements to believe that a decision be taken such - AAA + Carlos Avilés El Universal Monday July 17, 2006 Lawyers agree that the Electoral Tribunal of the Judiciary of the Federation (TEPJF) has the power to override the presidential election, but consider that currently there are no elements to believe that shall be decided of that type. At this point there is no problem, experts in electoral matters Fernando Franco González and Lorenzo Cordova, as well as constitutional and Edgar Zaldivar Arturo Corzo, agree that, although it is written, "if the Electoral Tribunal has the power to declare the validity presidential election, also has the power to declare the invalidity of the same. " Contrary to those who believe that the Court can not do this, the four lawyers believe that if the Constitution gives the power to TEPJF to qualify the presidential election, it would be absurd to think that he can not do in the negative. As to count every vote, opinions divide. Some dismiss the possibility and others say that it is possible, but say it depends on the quality of evidence and legal arguments that made the coalition For the Good of All. Lorenzo Córdova Vianello, former adviser to José Woldenberg in the IFE, said "it is legally possible to do the recount of any election." But qualifies his statement. Whether that happens, says Córdova Vianello, "depend on the quality of the components and evidence that made the coalition For the Good of All." The Electoral Law specialist now at the Institute for Legal Research of UNAM recalls that "the votes were already counted, and there is a recount "would have to be justified, would have a very strong legal elements." Fernando Franco González Salas, former judge federal election, acknowledges that this possibility exists. But in view of the now professor at the ITAM, this will not happen because "it would mean that the Court is assuming that there is a widespread violation." In addition to recalling that the Court can not review Eelctoral boxes that were not challenged. And, first, accurate González Salas, "In our system there are 80 000 boxes that have given good" because they were not challenged. http://www.eluniversal.com.mx/notas/362769.html
0 comments:
Post a Comment